<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Semi-exposed Hairline Shots</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hairjive.com/blog/2009/08/31/semi-exposed-hairline-shots/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hairjive.com/blog/2009/08/31/semi-exposed-hairline-shots/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Sep 2011 01:51:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: JRob</title>
		<link>http://hairjive.com/blog/2009/08/31/semi-exposed-hairline-shots/comment-page-1/#comment-44</link>
		<dc:creator>JRob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 06:05:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hairjive.com/blog/?p=238#comment-44</guid>
		<description>Hey Dave, thanks for the comment!

Yes, the lace is slightly visible in the pic, but rest assured it is completely undetectable without the macro lens setting on the camera. I don&#039;t have any paparazzi stalking me armed with $10,000 super-zoom cameras at this point so I&#039;m not too worried!

Seriously though, you do have a point about the lace being trimmed back to the hairline. I always trim it back with french lace because it prevents buckling, but with swiss lace I leave a little extra since it&#039;s a bit easier to work with. Under *normal* circumstances it is completely invisible as long as it is clean and attached properly, so I usually keep a little extra lace there. Plus, I look better with more of a comb down style, so for me the hairline isn&#039;t as big of a deal as it is for some.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Dave, thanks for the comment!</p>
<p>Yes, the lace is slightly visible in the pic, but rest assured it is completely undetectable without the macro lens setting on the camera. I don&#8217;t have any paparazzi stalking me armed with $10,000 super-zoom cameras at this point so I&#8217;m not too worried!</p>
<p>Seriously though, you do have a point about the lace being trimmed back to the hairline. I always trim it back with french lace because it prevents buckling, but with swiss lace I leave a little extra since it&#8217;s a bit easier to work with. Under *normal* circumstances it is completely invisible as long as it is clean and attached properly, so I usually keep a little extra lace there. Plus, I look better with more of a comb down style, so for me the hairline isn&#8217;t as big of a deal as it is for some.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://hairjive.com/blog/2009/08/31/semi-exposed-hairline-shots/comment-page-1/#comment-43</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 05:27:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hairjive.com/blog/?p=238#comment-43</guid>
		<description>It looks like the slightly visible lace grid extends down your forehead beyond the region where the front-most hairs are sewn in.  Would it be possible to trim the lace all the way back to the hairline to make the unit more undetectable?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It looks like the slightly visible lace grid extends down your forehead beyond the region where the front-most hairs are sewn in.  Would it be possible to trim the lace all the way back to the hairline to make the unit more undetectable?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

